Unstable Government Worse Scenario than New Elections: Think Tank
Unstable Government Worse Scenario than New Elections: Think Tank
Sofia, October 20 (BTA) - Bulgaria will be faced with a bigger
risk if it has an unstable government than if it opts for fresh
early elections in January-February 2015, the Institute for
Rightist Policy (IRP) said at a news conference Sunday hosted by
BTA's National Press Club. The think tank presented an analysis
alter the October 5 early parliamentary elections.
The IRP argued that the formation of a government should be
preceded by total consensus on the priorities of the future
governance and ensured stable parliamentary support, which,
however, should not include the left-wing parties and the
parties who supported the Plamen Oresharski cabinet of the past
year.
IRP Chairman Peter Nikolov argued that a cabinet formed at the
moment could very well become not a cabinet of stability and
reforms but one of timelessness and compromise.
Toma Bikov said that new early elections in January-February
2015 are not the worst-case scenario. "The worst-case scenario
is a government that creates the impression it could fall any
time," Bikov said, adding that it is wrong to assume that the
October 5 election results will be repeated in a new poll.
According to Bikov, IRP analyses show that at least three
parties in the just formed 43rd National Assembly will drop out
from a new parliament. He said that new early elections would
stabilize the political situation and consolidate the two major
blocs, the rightist and the leftist. "At the background of an
eight-party Parliament, it is practically impossible to have a
cabinet carrying out hard reforms," Bikov said.
He also said that the main problem now is the impossibility of
Parliament to produce a government. This is the second such
Parliament in Bulgaria's history. The issue of producing a
government is becoming harder still and could be solved in two
ways, according to Bikov. One is having a voting system with an
increased majoritarian element, while the second option is more
radical, holding a debate to amend the Constitution and shifting
to presidential governance.
The IRP argued that before disbanding the new National Assembly
- if such a development occurs - the MPs should pass the budget
update and also amendments to the Election Code replacing the
currently used d'Hondt method for the distribution of seats.

EUR 1.9558
USD 1.7284
CHF 1.8677